IELTS WRITING TASK 2 – OPINION
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for the building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Sample Answer 1
IELTS WRITING TASK 2 – OPINION
IELTS WRITING TASK 2 – OPINION
Presenting, the issue of living space has risen into prominence in various places of the country. There is absolutely no way to construct new houses in some cities, and many people suggest to carry out construction in the countryside. However, it is a controversial issue introducing heavy debates.
Opponents of urbanization of former rural areas say that it would result a dramatic effect on the natural ecosystem of such places. The most drastic consequences are caused by construction that necessarily follows any human settlement that is, roads,poser lines, means of water supply and such. The construction of those engineering projects leads to destruction of natural bios of ponds, rivers and forests, causing many animals to shift to other places or go extinct. The arguments of environmentalists do make sense, but there also other ideas supporting the countryside occupation.
First of all, not even the most extreme supporters of spreading urbanization maintain that all of the countryside should be occupied with homes all over the place. In fact, there are good examples of even bigger cities living perhaps not in harmony with surrounding ecosystem, but at least in some form of cooperation. Having a considerable number of parks inside inhabited area help both people to feel themselves better and plants and animals to have some sort of habitat. If I may to present on example, the city of Zaporizhla where I live has a large island between the parts of the city which is covered with trees,plants and largely unoccupied, being a nice counterpart to heavily populated nearby areas.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that while opponents of countryside settlement have many valid points, the condition is not as drastic as they portray it, and co-existence of human population with ecosystem is quite possible.
(293 words).
This is an answer which achieved a Band 7.0 score. Here is the examiner’s comment:
This is a well-organised piece of writing, presenting ideas on both sides of the debate, developing these ideas effectively and also snowing the candidate’s own position throughout the response. Ideas are logically organised and there is progression in the train of thought. Each paragraph has a clear central topic which is developed, and there is effective use of cohesive devices. The lexical resource is sufficient to allow some flexibility and precision and there is use of less common items. There are occasional errors in spelling and collocation , but these do not detract from overall clarity. There is a variety of complex structures used with flexibility and accuracy, while grammar and punctuation are generally well controlled. Errors do not adversely affect the overall message.
Sample Answer 2
IELTS WRITING TASK 2 – OPINION
Introducing, the issue of a living space has ascended into unmistakable quality in numerous spots of the nation. There is positively no real way to manufacture new houses in certain urban communities, and many individuals recommend to do development in the open country. In any case, it is a questionable subject presenting substantial discussions.
Rivals of urbanization of previous country regions express that it would cause an emotional impact on the normal biological system of such places. The most extraordinary results are brought about by framework that essentially follows any human settlement that is, roads,poser lines, methods for water flexibly and such. The development of those building ventures prompts demolition of normal profiles of lakes, streams and woods, making numerous creatures relocate or go wiped out. The contentions of earthy people do bode well, however there additionally significant thoughts supporting the field occupation.
First of al, not even the most outrageous supporters of spreading urbanization keep up that the entirety of the wide open ought to be recorded with homes everywhere. Truth be told, there are genuine instances of much bigger urban areas living maybe not in agreement with encompassing nature, however at any rate in some type of collaboration. Having an extensive measures of parks inside occupied territory help the two individuals to feel themselves better and plants and creatures to have a type of home. On the off chance that I may to introduce on model, the city of Zaporizhla where I live has a huge island between the pieces of the city which is secured with trees and to a great extent vacant, being a decent partner to intensely Populated close by locale.
Taking everything into account, I might want to pressure that while adversaries of wide open settlement have numerous admirable sentiments, the circumstance isn’t as intense as they depict it, and concurrence of human populace with nature is very conceivable.
(315 words).
This is an answer which achieved a Band 6.0 score. Here is the examiner’s comment:
This is an efficient bit of composing, introducing thoughts on the two sides of the discussion, building up these thoughts viably and furthermore snowing the competitor’s own situation all through the reaction. Thoughts are coherently sorted out and there is movement in the line of reasoning. Each section has an unmistakable focal point which is created, and there is successful utilization of durable gadgets. The lexical asset is adequate to permit some adaptability and accuracy and there is utilization of less regular things. There are intermittent mistakes in spelling and collocation , yet these don’t take away from in general clearness. There is an assortment of complex structures utilized with adaptability and exactness, while language and accentuation are commonly all around controlled. Blunders don’t antagonistically influence the general message.
Sample Answer 3
Presenting, the issue of a living space has rose into unquestionable quality in various spots of the country. There is decidedly no genuine method to produce new houses in certain urban networks, and numerous people prescribe to do advancement in the open nation. Regardless, it is a flawed subject introducing considerable conversations.
Opponents of urbanization of past nation areas express that it would cause an enthusiastic effect on the typical natural arrangement of such places. The most phenomenal outcomes are achieved by system that basically follows any human settlement that is, roads,poser lines, strategies for water deftly and such. The improvement of those structure adventures prompts destruction of typical profiles of lakes, streams and woods, causing various animals to migrate or go cleared out. The conflicts of gritty individuals do look good, anyway there furthermore critical contemplations supporting the field occupation.
First of al, not even the most ludicrous supporters of spreading urbanization keep up that the aggregate of the all the way open should be recorded with homes all over the place. In all honesty, there are authentic examples of a lot greater urban territories living possibly not in concurrence with including nature, anyway at any rate in some sort of joint effort. Having a broad proportions of parks inside an involved area help the two people to feel themselves better and plants and animals to have a kind of home. In case I may to present on model, the city of Zaporizhla where I live has a tremendous island between the bits of the city which is made sure about with trees and by and large empty, being a better than average accomplice to strongly Populated near to area.
Considering, I should pressure that while foes of all the way open settlement have various honorable feelings, the situation isn’t as exceptional as they portray it, and multifariousness of human people with nature is entirely possible.
(317 words).
This is an answer which achieved a Band 6.0 score. Here is the examiner’s comment:
This is an effective piece of forming, presenting considerations on the different sides of the conversation, developing these musings reasonably and moreover snowing the contender’s own circumstance all through the response. Considerations are soundly sifted through and there is development in the line of thinking. Each segment has an undeniable point of convergence which is made, and there is fruitful use of strong devices. The lexical resource is satisfactory to allow some versatility and exactness and there is usage of less standard things. There are discontinuous missteps in spelling and collocation , yet these don’t detract from all in all clearness. There is an arrangement of complex structures used with versatility and precision, while language and highlight are generally all around controlled. Bumbles don’t unfairly impact the general message.
Like and Subscribe our Youtube channel Way To Crack IELTS